There’s Architects like me, technicians, draughtspeople. So who’s right for your project?
Basically it comes down to design, and complexity.
Architects train for at least 7 years, with experience on a range of buildings like housing, private homes, public buildings, from the urban scale down to the detail.
So if you want that design thinking – for a bespoke house extension, or to see the development capacity of a site – get an architect.
Architect is a protected title – you need to be registered with the ARB, optionally the RIBA too. And we’re heavily regulated. We use the RIBA Plan of work, a detailed tool to manage the risk in project. But that takes time, which we have to charge for. If the projects too small, it’s just gets proportionally more expensive for us to provide the full set of services from concept design through to completion.
Architectural Technicans – look out for ones who are chartered with CIAT – often specailise in the simpler residential projects, albeit generally with more of a technical emphasis and less of a design focus.
There’s also unqualified draughts people offering ‘architectural services’. The might be fine for preparing drawings with no design work but beware. I’ve seen them design planning refusals for obvious reasons, or designs for spaces you physically can’t get into!
But if you want the architect’s design thinking, without committing to the full suite of services, we offer a layout service, so our clients get our design thinking to unlock the potential of your property, even if they end up working up those ideas with a technician or their builder.